Wholeship Ltd · National Drone Hub · Predannack

Question. Delete.
Simplify.

A ten-minute thinking exercise: applying a five-step engineering algorithm to the biggest new problem in UK drone operations — and seeing what falls out.

01 / 08
What changed

The drone rulebook was rewritten — and it keeps tightening

APR 2025

UK SORA arrives

Every complex operation now needs a SORA — a risk assessment of the intended operation — approved by the CAA.

JAN 2026

Remote ID + registration

New drones must broadcast ID; the registration threshold drops to 100g.

OCT 2026

Decision No. 60

Tighter compliance guidance comes into force. The bar for evidence rises again.

2027

Routine BVLOS

CAA roadmap targets routine long-range flying — application volume explodes.

The shift in one sentence: the CAA no longer accepts promises — it audits evidence.
02 / 08
What it costs

Approval is now expensive — and it expires

£2,422 – £17,300
CAA application fee, 2026/27
from the simplest case (SAIL 1) to the most complex (SAIL 5/6)
12 months
Authorisation lifespan
then you renew — and re-evidence
£346 / hour
CAA excess assessment
the meter runs when your evidence is unclear

And the fee is the small part. The expensive part is assembling the evidence behind it — consultant time, data hunting, rework.

03 / 08
The insight

Approval is a data problem, not a flying problem

To prove a flight path is safe over the ground, the CAA wants answers to ordinary questions — answered with extraordinary rigour:

Who lives under the route?

Population density along every metre of the flight path — not a guess, a number with a source.

What shelters them?

Building footprints and types — a person indoors is protected; a beach crowd is not.

Where does it end safely?

Containment: if the drone fails, where can it come down without hurting anyone?

Can you prove all of it?

Every claim documented, sourced and auditable — and refreshed every 12 months.

04 / 08
My starting point

I’ve solved this exact problem shape before

Property lending

Banks won’t lend on a development site without defensible evidence.

I built a live product that takes fragmented public data — planning records, sold prices, flood zones, appeal decisions — and turns it into a lender-ready evidence pack. Brokers use it today.

LIVE · IN USE · PAID FOR

The concept: “Corridor in. CAA-ready ground-risk evidence out.”

05 / 08
How I work · the five-step algorithm

Five steps, in strict order — applied to drone approval

1

Question every requirement

Every piece of evidence must trace to a named CAA rule. If you can’t name it, don’t collect it.

2

Delete

The old 200-page safety case was padding. Keep only what your risk level demands. If you don’t add 10% back, you didn’t delete enough.

3

Simplify

Only now: one data pipeline, one document standard, one audit trail. Simplifying bloat just gives you polished bloat.

4

Accelerate

Approvals expire in 12 months. Renewal should be a refresh, not a rebuild. Cycle time = flying time.

5

Automate — last, never first

Automating a bad process produces wrong answers faster. After steps 1–4, pack generation becomes push-button.

Most people run this list backwards — they automate a process that should never have existed.

06 / 08
What falls out: a business idea
FlightCase
“Corridor in. CAA-ready ground-risk evidence out.”

You draw the corridor

The operator sketches the flight path — a line on a map. That’s the whole input.

The engine does the digging

Population, buildings, sheltering, land use — pulled from public data, matched to the route, every figure sourced.

Out comes the evidence pack

The ground-risk section of a SORA case — structured, auditable, CAA-formatted, refreshable at renewal.

07 / 08
In one breath
The rules changed.
Evidence is the product.
I build evidence.

Corridor in. CAA-ready evidence out. Question first, delete second, automate last.

Thank you — questions welcome.  ·  William Tyler-Street

08 / 08
Appendix · only if asked

The jargon, decoded

SORA

Specific Operations Risk Assessment — a risk assessment of the intended operation. In practice: a planning application for a flight. Structured, evidence-based, approved by the CAA.

SAIL

The risk score of an operation, level 1–6. Higher SAIL = riskier flight = more evidence demanded, and a higher application fee.

BVLOS

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight — flying further than the pilot can physically see. Where the commercial money is. Routine by ~2027 per the CAA roadmap.

Remote ID

A digital number plate: drones must broadcast who they're registered to while flying. Anonymity in the airspace is over.

Decision No. 60

A CAA instrument in force 1 Oct 2026 tightening how compliance is evidenced under SORA. The evidence bar rises again.

Registration at 100g

The threshold dropped from 250g to 100g in Jan 2026 — even very small drones now need a registered operator.

APPENDIX

Speaker notes

01 / 08 10:00